Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39698264›Full record

ReviewACS pharmacology & translational science2024

Advances in Development of Drug Treatment for Hemophilia with Inhibitors.

Surasak Wichaiyo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Surasak WichaiyoDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400 Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1343-7055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with hemophilia A and B who have inhibitors face limited treatment options, because replacement therapy with clotting factor VIII or IX concentrates is ineffective, particularly for patients with high-titer inhibitors. Current mainstay therapies include immune tolerance induction (through frequent injections of clotting factor VIII or IX concentrates) to eradicate inhibitors and bypassing agents (such as recombinant activated clotting factor VII and activated prothrombin complex concentrates) for the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes. The use of these agents typically requires intravenous injections and sometimes hospitalization, which can be burdensome for patients. More recently, emicizumab, a bispecific antibody that mimics the function of activated clotting factor VIII, has demonstrated favorable efficacy for prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors, representing a promising new therapeutic strategy. Ongoing research aims to discover and develop easy-to-use nonfactor agents for managing hemophilia with inhibitors. This review summarizes the current understanding of the pathophysiology of inhibitor development in hemophilia, outlines existing treatment options, and discusses advancements in novel therapeutic biologics, including a recombinant activated clotting factor VII variant (marzeptacog alfa), a new bispecific antibody (Mim8), antitissue factor pathway inhibitor antibodies (concizumab and marstacimab), and small interfering RNA targeting antithrombin (fitusiran). All of these agents are administered subcutaneously, with some offering the convenience of less frequent dosing (e.g., weekly or monthly). These potential drug candidates may provide significant benefits for the prophylaxis or treatment of bleeding disorders in patients with hemophilia and inhibitors.

Identifiers

PMID39698264
PMCPMC11650736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.