ArticleJournal of pain research2024
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Central Sensitization Inventory Among Chinese Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Edmonton-33 scale in patients with head and neck cancer.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This research aims to develop and validate the Chinese version of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI-CV) for patients suffering from chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP). The study evaluates both the validity and reliability of the CSI-CV. Patients and Methods: The cross-cultural adaptation of the scale strictly adhered to the principles of Bombardier and Beaton. Initially, two professors of Chinese-English translation independently translated the original CSI scale into the target language, and then collaborated with an expert in cross-cultural adaptation to merge into a single version. This version was back-translated into English by two professors whose native language is English. Following this, the scale underwent preliminary review by bilingual experts and the research team, and was preliminarily tested, ultimately culminating in the formation of the CSI-CV version. A total of 310 patients with CNSLBP completed the CSI-CV, while 50 of them repeated the survey one week later to test the stability of the scale. The CSI-CV's reliability, validity, and internal consistency were assessed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA), correlation coefficients, and Cronbach's α. Results: EFA revealed five distinct factors from the 25 CSI-CV items, covering physical symptoms, emotional distress, fatigue and sleep disturbances, headaches and jaw symptoms, and urinary issues, with a total explained variance of 60.24%. The Cronbach's α was 0.910, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.924, indicating strong reliability. Moderate correlations were observed between CSI-CV scores and Five-Level EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire (r = -0.515), the Brief Pain Inventory (r = 0.586) and Oswestry Disability Index (r = 0.416), demonstrating significant associations with these measures. Conclusion: The CSI-CV exhibits excellent internal consistency, factor structure, and reliability. Its successful cultural adaptation offers valuable insights for improving treatment approaches for patients with CNSLBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.