Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39698235›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied crystallography2024

Maximally efficient exchange in thin flow cells using density gradients.

Megan E Mitchell, Charles F Majkrzak, David P Hoogerheide

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied crystallography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Megan E MitchellCenter for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Charles F MajkrzakCenter for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
David P HoogerheideCenter for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow cells are ubiquitous in laboratories and automated instrumentation, and are crucial for ease of sample preparation, analyte addition and buffer exchange. The assumption that the fluids have exchanged completely in a flow cell is often critical to data interpretation. This article describes the buoyancy effects on the exchange of fluids with differing densities or viscosities in thin, circular flow cells. Depending on the flow direction, fluid exchange varies from highly efficient to drastically incomplete, even after a large excess of exchange volume. Numerical solutions to the Navier-Stokes and Cahn-Hilliard equations match well with experimental observations. This leads to quantitative predictions of the conditions where buoyancy forces in thin flow cells are significant. A novel method is introduced for exchanging fluid cells by accounting for and utilizing buoyancy effects that can be essential to obtain accurate results from measurements performed within closed-volume fluid environments.

Indexed as

automated liquid handlingflow cellsfluid exchangeneutron reflectometryneutron scattering

Identifiers

PMID39698235
PMCPMC11653391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.