Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39698154›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

The effects of listening on speaker and listener while talking about character strengths: an open science school-wide collaboration.

Tia Moin, Netta Weinstein, Guy Itzchakov, Amanda Branson, Beth Law, Lydia Yee, Emma Pape, Rebecca Y M Cheung, Anthony Haffey, Bhismadev Chakrabarti and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. How do people perceive listeners?Royal Society open science · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tia MoinUniversity of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9638-7830
Netta WeinsteinUniversity of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2200-6617
Guy ItzchakovUniversity of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1516-6719
Amanda BransonUniversity of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6584-9214
Beth LawUniversity of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1828-5466
Lydia YeeUniversity of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0464-6058
Emma PapeUniversity of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9534-5161
Rebecca Y M CheungUniversity of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0998-7991
Anthony HaffeyUniversity of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4445-3584
Bhismadev ChakrabartiUniversity of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6649-7895
Philip BeamanUniversity of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5124-242X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Listening is understood to be a foundational element in practices that rely on effective conversations, but there is a gap in our understanding of what the effects of high-quality listening are on both the speaker and listener. This registered report addressed this gap by training one group of participants to listen well as speakers discuss their character strengths, allowing us to isolate the role relational listening plays in strengths-based conversations. Participants were paired and randomly assigned to a high-quality listening (experimental) or moderate-quality listening (comparison) condition manipulated through a validated video-based training. High-quality listening predicted a more constructive relational experience; specifically, positivity resonance. Intrapersonal experiences (perceived authenticity and state anxiety) were not affected. Those who engaged in high-quality listening expressed a behavioural intention to continue listening, but condition did not predict a behavioural intention for speakers to continue applying character strengths. This is the first evidence of positivity resonance as a shared outcome between both a speaker and listener when the listener conveys high-quality (as opposed to 'everyday') listening. These early findings merit further study with stronger listening manipulations to explore the potential role of listening within interpersonal communication, and inform the applied psychological sciences (counselling, psychotherapy, coaching, organizational, education).

Indexed as

anxietyauthenticitylisteningpositivity-resonancestrengths

Identifiers

PMID39698154
PMCPMC11651903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.