Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39698153›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Increasing environmental fluctuations can dampen variability of endogenously cycling populations.

Nicholas Kortessis, José Miguel Ponciano, Franz W Simon, Jake M Ferguson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicholas KortessisDepartment of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC 27109, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4690-7508
José Miguel PoncianoDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Franz W SimonDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
Jake M FergusonDepartment of Biology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how populations respond to increasingly variable conditions is a major objective for natural resource managers forecasting extinction risk. The lesson from current modelling is clear: increasing environmental variability increases population abundance variability. We show that this paradigm fails to describe a broad class of empirically observed dynamics, namely endogenously driven population cycles. In contrast to the dominant paradigm, these populations can exhibit reduced long-run population variance under increasing environmental variability. We provide evidence for a mechanistic explanation of this phenomenon that relies on how stochasticity interacts with long transient dynamics present in the deterministic cycling model. This interaction stands in contrast to the often assumed additivity of stochastic and deterministic drivers of population fluctuations. We show evidence for the phenomenon in two cyclical populations: flour beetles and Canadian lynx. We quantify the impact of the phenomenon with new theory that partitions the effects of nonlinear dynamics and stochastic variation on dynamical systems. In both empirical examples, the partitioning shows that the interaction between deterministic and stochastic dynamics reduces the variance in population size. Our results highlight that previous predictions about extinction under environmental variability may prove inadequate to understand the effects of climate change in some populations.

Indexed as

extinction risklong transientnonlinear dynamicsstabilitystochasticity

Identifiers

PMID39698153
PMCPMC11651921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.