ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2024
Neuroanatomical correlates of language impairment in non-fluent variant of primary progressive aphasia.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidimensional cognitive deficit in logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
- Quantifying brain atrophy in Frontotemporal Dementia: a head-to-head comparison of neuroimaging techniques.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Non-fluent variant of primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) is a neurodegenerative disorder with a predominantly speech and language impairment. Apraxia of speech and expressive agrammatisms along with decreased speech fluency and impaired grammar comprehension are the most typical disorder manifestations but with the course of the disease other language disturbances may also arise. Most studies have investigated these symptoms individually, and there is still no consensus on whether they have similar or different neuroanatomical foundations in nfvPPA. In addition, only few works have focused on the functional connectivity correlates. The aim of our study was to simultaneously investigate functional and structural brain-language associations in one group of nfvPPA. Methods: Twenty eight patients were enrolled and underwent brain MRI and language assessment. Apraxia of speech, expressive and receptive agrammatisms, repetition, naming and single word comprehension correlates were identified using voxel-based morphometry and resting-state functional MRI (ROI-to-ROI analysis). Results and discussion: Among the structural correlates, the most common were inferior frontal gyrus (was associated with fluency, both expressive and receptive agrammatisms) and supramarginal gyrus (apraxia of speech, receptive agrammatisms, naming and repetition). Apart from that, neuroanatomical foundations were different for each of the core nfvPPA language domains, including superior parietal lobule involvement in fluency, temporoparietal areas in receptive agrammatisms and supplemental motor area in apraxia of speech. Functional correlations were even more diverse. In general, connectivity decrease between temporoparietal structures was more typical for expressive and receptive agrammatisms, single word comprehension and naming, while apraxia of speech, fluency and repetition showed connectivity disruption mainly among the frontoparietal region and subcortical structures. Overall, extensive structural and functional changes are involved in the development of language and speech disturbances in nfvPPA with distinctive neuroanatomical foundations for each domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.