Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39698143›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2024

Analysis of the relationship between antineoplastic drugs and suicide-related adverse events based on the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system database.

Nan Zhao, Huimin Wang, Huilin Xu, Xixian Tang, Dedong Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nan ZhaoDepartment of Oncology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Huimin WangDepartment of Oncology, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, Shandong, China.
Huilin XuDepartment of Oncology, The Fifth Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xixian TangDepartment of Oncology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Dedong CaoDepartment of Oncology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5777-4176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The potential association between new antineoplastic drugs and an increased risk of suicide-related adverse drug reactions remains unclear. This study aims to utilize the FAERS public database to analyze suicide-related adverse drug reactions associated with common antitumor drugs and to investigate potential risk signals for such adverse drug reactions. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis utilizing the FAERS database. The FAERS database was examined for reports of suicide-related adverse events associated with antitumor drugs, spanning from 2004 to 2023. To identify and verify adverse event signals, we employed reporting odds ratios, proportional reporting ratios, and Bayesian methods (Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network). Additionally, logistic regression analysis was performed to assess outcomes in tumor patients. Results: A total of 223,781 suicide-related adverse event reports were screened, of which 3790 involved common antitumor drugs. The top five drugs reported were tretinoin ( Conclusion: The findings suggest that antineoplastic drugs may not statistically increase the risk of suicide-related adverse events. However, specific tumor types and suicide-related adverse events may contribute to increased mortality in cancer patients. Further research is warranted to elucidate the risk of suicide-related adverse events in oncology patients.

Indexed as

adverse drug reactionsdrug safetyFAERS databaseNeoplasmssuicide

Identifiers

PMID39698143
PMCPMC11653442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.