Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39698136›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nursing sciences2024

A review of clinical practice guidelines on the management of preeclampsia and nursing inspiration.

Ruiyang Sun, Xiu Zhu, Junying Li, Ting Zhang, Hong Lu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nursing sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruiyang SunSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xiu ZhuSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Junying LiSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Ting ZhangBeijing Institutes for Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Hong LuSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To review, evaluate, and synthesize the recommendations of guidelines on preeclampsia (PE) from a nursing perspective. Methods: This is a systematic review of international and national guidelines on PE. Electronic databases and related guideline websites were searched from 2013 to 2023. After systematic retrieval and screening, we used the AGREE II tool to appraise the methodological quality of guidelines that met the eligibility criteria. Then, we analyzed and summarized the recommendations using descriptive analysis and the framework method. Furthermore, we rated the quality of evidence and the strength of the recommendations using the GRADE approach. Results: Ten guidelines were included, among which eight were deemed "clinically useful" and records were extracted. In total, 31 recommendations, including 46 items on the nursing management of PE, were summarized from three aspects: 1) antenatal care (18 recommendations), including the assessment and regular monitoring of PE, standardized blood pressure (BP) measurement, prevention education for PE, antihypertensive agent monitoring, and magnesium sulfate (MgSO Conclusions: This study provides professional, evidence-based nursing care resources both for preservice education for nursing staff and health care education for women with PE to help them detect and treat PE in a timely manner.

Indexed as

Clinical practice guidelinesEvidence-based practicesPreeclampsiaSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39698136
PMCPMC11650664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.