ArticleHeliyon2024
Quasi-Newton optimised Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks for wind farm power prediction.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Having accurate and effective wind energy forecasting that can be easily incorporated into smart networks is important. Appropriate planning and energy generation predictions are necessary for these infrastructures. The production of wind energy is linked to instability and unpredictability. Wind energy forecasting has traditionally been performed using statistical models, but with the advent of artificial intelligence (AI), research indicates that AI is more accurate than the statical technique. In this study, the nominal power of six wind farms in China was predicted using Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KAN) and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) models. KAN as an alternative to the conventional MLP, has the ability to handle problems with scalability, vanishing gradients, and interpretability associated with MLP. The KAN uses learnable B-Spline as activation functions prompting it to address the issues of the MLP. We employed the Radial Basis Function (RBF) with Gaussian kernels to approximate the 3-order B-spline basis. In most deep learning models stochastic gradient-based optimization algorithms such as Adaptive Moment Estimation (ADAM) and Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) optimizer are mostly employed, a quasi-Newton optimization technique Limited-memory Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno algorithm LBFGS was employed in this work to approximate the Hessian matrix and estimate the parameter space's curvature. Also, in the preprocessing of the data, the Interquartile Range (IQR) technique is used to handle outliers and a clustering-based K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) imputer to handle missing values. Based on different sites, the KAN-LBFGS shows superior performance based on the performance evaluation metrics with site 5 achieving MSE of 0.0039, RMSE of 0.0622, MAE of 0.0352, and DC of 0.9468. The study highlights the importance of the model's architecture, preprocessing and optimization techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.