ArticleCardiology research2024
Yield of Tilt Table Test in Diagnosing Syncope in Patients With Suspected Neurally Mediated Syncope.
Article in Cardiology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Syncope is a common medical condition. The reflex or neurally mediated syncope (NMS) is the most frequent type. The tilt table test (TTT) helps distinguish syncope from other common causes of complete loss of consciousness, such as epilepsy, define syncope subtypes and guide management. This study aimed to assess the TTT yield in patients with suspected NMS and to compare the nitroglycerin (NTG) and isoproterenol (Isuprel) provocative protocols. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of the data of 426 consecutive patients who underwent TTT at the Heart Center at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between January 1, 2006, and March 31, 2017. Results: The age at referral for TTT ranged from 7 to 84 years (mean 38.4 ± 15.75 years), and 212 (49.8%) were males. The main clinical manifestations were recurrent syncope in 259 patients (60.8%), a single syncopal episode in 60 (14.1%), and pre-syncope or dizzy spells without loss of consciousness in 171(25.1%). The test was positive in 295 patients (69.2%), with type 1 (mixed response) seen in 151 patients (51.19%), type 2a (cardioinhibitory without pause) in 16 (5.4%), type 2b (cardioinhibitory with pause) in 10 patients (3.39%), and type 3 (vasodepressor) in 118 patients (40%). A false positive test was seen in 11 patients (2.6%) and a false negative in 27 patients (6.3%). The overall test sensitivity was 91%, specificity was 89%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 96%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 79%. Conclusions: The TTT is beneficial in diagnosing syncope in males and females and patients of young and old ages. A provocative test utilizing NTG provides a shorter, more straightforward test with the same diagnostic accuracy as the isoproterenol test. Lifestyle modification is effective and remains the primary intervention in managing patients with NMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.