ArticleCardiology research2024
Effects of Heart Rate Fluctuation on Aerobic Training Outcomes in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Prospective Study.
Article in Cardiology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different heart rate fluctuation ranges during aerobic training on outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: Ninety-seven patients diagnosed with stable CAD were enrolled between March 2017 and December 2019. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: the control (CON) group, the medium-intensity heart rate small range (MIS) group, and the medium-intensity heart rate large range (MIL) group. The CON group received standard care and patient education, while the MIS and MIL groups underwent personalized rehabilitation training with specific heart rate fluctuation targeted ranges, in addition to standard care. Cardiopulmonary function and exercise performances were assessed using resting heart rate (RHR), maximum heart rate (HRmax), heart rate recovery (HRR), and a 6-min walk test (6MWT) at the baseline and after 16 weeks of training. Results: The MIS group demonstrated a significant reduction in RHR compared to the CON and MIL groups. While both exercise rehabilitation groups exhibited improvement in HRR, only the MIS group achieved a statistically significant improvement compared to the CON group. Post-training HRmax and 6MWT performance increased in both MIS and MIL groups, with only the MIL group presenting statistical significance compared to the CON group. Conclusion: Exercise rehabilitation with different training regimens can enhance cardiac function in patients with CAD. Different heart rate modulation strategies yielded distinct effects on cardiopulmonary function. Maintenance of a narrower heart rate fluctuation during exercise was observed to significantly enhance the effectiveness of rehabilitation, which could lead to new treatment protocols or optimization of existing strategies for patients with cardiovascular conditions. The combination of 6MWT and power bicycle training may offer an effective method for improving cardiac function in community-based rehabilitation settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.