Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39697988›Full record

ReviewExtracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids2023

Biodistribution of therapeutic extracellular vesicles.

Dhanu Gupta, Oscar P B Wiklander, Matthew J A Wood, Samir El-Andaloussi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Navigating theNanoscale advances · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Young cardiac telocyte-derived exosomes rejuvenate aging hearts in rats.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dhanu GuptaDepartment of Paediatrics. University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7TY, UK.
Oscar P B WiklanderBiomolecular Medicine, Division of Biomolecular and Cellular Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge 14151, Sweden.
Matthew J A WoodDepartment of Paediatrics. University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7TY, UK.
Samir El-AndaloussiBiomolecular Medicine, Division of Biomolecular and Cellular Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge 14151, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of extracellular vesicles (EVs) has seen a tremendous paradigm shift in the past two decades, from being regarded as cellular waste bags to being considered essential mediators in intercellular communication. Their unique ability to transfer macromolecules across cells and biological barriers has made them a rising star in drug delivery. Mounting evidence suggests that EVs can be explored as efficient drug delivery vehicles for a range of therapeutic macromolecules. In contrast to many synthetic delivery systems, these vesicles appear exceptionally well tolerated

Indexed as

CNS targetingExosomesextracellular vesiclesin vivo biodistributiontargeted delivery

Identifiers

PMID39697988
PMCPMC11648525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.