ArticleCureus2024
Misdiagnosis of Aortic Dissection Due to Streak Artifact in the Descending Aorta.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pulsation-related motion artifact of the external iliac artery mimicking localized dissection: An unexpected finding.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced CT is a primary tool in emergency departments for diagnosing acute aortic dissection, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity. However, artifacts such as streak artifacts can mimic aortic dissection, leading to misdiagnosis. Here, we report a case involving a 21-year-old male who sustained traumatic injuries after a motor vehicle accident. Initial contrast-enhanced CT indicated a possible localized dissection in the descending aorta. Conservative treatment was initiated under the presumption of aortic dissection. Upon re-evaluation with ECG-gated CT, the previously identified "dissection" artifact had disappeared, revealing no actual aortic injury. This case illustrates how heartbeat-induced streak artifacts, while commonly seen in the aortic root, can also manifest in the descending aorta. Our findings underscore the importance of considering artifacts in atypical cases of aortic dissection, particularly when findings are localized to areas of the aorta in close proximity to the heart. For trauma patients, while dynamic contrast-enhanced CT remains standard, ECG-gated CT should be selectively applied where motion artifacts are suspected. This case highlights the role of advanced imaging options in distinguishing between true aortic pathology and artifacts, aiding in appropriate clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.