Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39697931›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Reasons and Factors Affecting the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Length of Stay of Full-Term Newborns: A Systematic Review.

Noha J Alhamawi, Hadeel A Alharbi, Mohammed H Alqahtani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Noha J AlhamawiPediatrics, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Hadeel A AlharbiPediatrics, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Mohammed H AlqahtaniNeonatology, Al Yamamah Hospital, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a significant challenge in predicting the duration of the neonatal hospital length of stay (LOS) due to the complicated factors that affect newborns. Most studies are conducted among pre-term neonates, in which the gestational age is lower than 37 weeks and the birth weight of patients is considered a major risk factor for a prolonged LOS. No previous systematic review of the literature was conducted among the full-term population. This review aims to determine the risk factors for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) LOS from multiple studies affecting full-term patients. The included studies focused on assessing reasons and factors affecting the NICU LOS of newborns, including "full-term newborns." We included studies that considered the NICU LOS as the primary outcome. Both retrospective and prospective studies were eligible for inclusion. The risk of bias for the included studies was evaluated using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool suggested by the Cochrane Prognosis Methods Group. The literature search of the databases identified 637 potentially relevant articles, among which 10 met the inclusion criteria and were selected for this review. Among the 10 studies, three risk factors were identified: disease-related, parent-related, and inherent factors. These factors constitute a critical risk factor most widely studied and consistently associated with LOS for the full-term population. Our findings offer an updated extensive summary of this aspect that has not been considered in detail in the literature. In conclusion, several critical risk factors affecting neonatal LOS were discovered in the published studies in this systematic review. However, there is a need for more prospective studies with standardized approaches that are crucial to confirm these findings and help develop effective interventions.

Indexed as

hospital length of stay (los)intensive care unitneonatalrisk factorssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39697931
PMCPMC11655050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.