ArticleTranslational cancer research2024
Integrative multi-omics and machine learning approach reveals tumor microenvironment-associated prognostic biomarkers in ovarian cancer.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision Biomarker Identification in Gynecological Cancers Using Coexpression Networks and Attention-Based LSTM in Healthcare 4.0.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A multi-branch ensemble learning framework for detection of non-small cell lung cancer via T-cell receptor sequencing.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Leveraging machine learning models to evaluate immune infiltration in the ovarian cancer microenvironment: a single-cell analysis approach.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Ovarian Cancer: Multi-Omics Data Integration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) is a globally prevalent malignancy with significant morbidity and mortality, yet its heterogeneity poses challenges in treatment and prognosis. Recognizing the crucial role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in OC progression, this study leverages integrative multi-omics and machine learning to uncover TME-associated prognostic biomarkers, paving the way for more personalized therapeutic interventions. Methods: Employing a rigorous multi-omics approach, this study analyzed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data from OC and normal tissue samples, including high-grade serous OC (HGSOC) from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: GSE184880) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) OC cohort, utilizing the Seurat package to annotate 700 TME-related genes. A prognostic model was developed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and independently validated against similarly composed HGSOC datasets. Comprehensive gene expression and immune cell infiltration analyses were conducted, employing advanced algorithms like xCell to delineate the immune landscape of HGSOC. Results: Our investigation unveiled distinctive immune cell infiltration patterns and gene expression profiles within the TME of HGSOC. Notably, the prevalence of exhausted CD8 Conclusions: This study presents a groundbreaking exploration of the OC TME, offering vital insights into its molecular intricacies. By systematically deciphering the TME-associated gene signatures, the research illuminates the potential of these biomarkers in refining patient prognosis and guiding treatment strategies. Our findings underscore the necessity for personalized medicine in OC treatment, potentially enhancing patient survival rates and quality of life. This study marks a significant stride in understanding and combatting the complexities of OC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.