ArticleTranslational cancer research2024
Prognostic analysis of SYTL4 in acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- miR-330-3p Inhibits the Development of Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Targeting SYTL4.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of SYTL4 differential expression and clinical implications in DLBCL.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a highly heterogeneous hematological malignancy. The key problem lies in the complexity of the genome, so that drug resistance and relapse have become the main problems. Recent studies have found an association between synaptotagmin-like 4 (SYTL4) and drug resistance in triple-negative breast cancer and its high expression is correlated with poor prognosis; however, it is unclear whether this gene is associated with the prognosis of AML. This study aimed to investigate the role and action mechanism of SYTL4 in AML. Methods: We downloaded gene expression profiles and corresponding clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) public database and conducted differential and survival analyses using the Limma and survival packages in R. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, univariate COX, and multivariate COX were used for gene prediction analysis. Co-expression analysis of SYTL4 was performed using Limma, and enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes in the SYTL4 high- and low-expression groups was conducted. We performed immune cell infiltration using the CIBERSORTx algorithm. Results: The expression level of SYTL4 was highest in the poor prognosis group, and lowest in the good prognosis group. Survival was better in the SYTL4 low expression group than that in the high expression group. The areas under the ROC curve for TCGA-Acute Myeloid Leukemia (TCGA-LAML) at 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.725, 0.683, and 0.787, respectively. Sushi repeat protein X-linked 2 (SRPX2), caveolae associated protein 2 (CAVIN2), and other genes were identified as positive regulators of SYTL4 expression, whereas lactoperoxidase (LPO), diacylglycerol lipase beta (DAGLB), and other genes were identified as negative regulators. Differentially expressed genes in the SYTL4 high- and low-expression groups were enriched in pathways such as the embryonic skeletal system and platelet alpha granules. Differences were observed in follicular helper T cells, Tregs, monocytes, and M2 macrophages between SYTL4 high- and low-expression groups. Conclusions: SYTL4 expression negatively correlates with AML prognosis and may be associated with exosome secretion in AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.