Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39697736›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2024

Epidemiological characteristics of myxopapillary ependymoma and factors affecting overall survival: a SEER-based analysis.

Ge Huang, Zhengyuan Xie, Jinhong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ge HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, China.
Zhengyuan XieDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, China.
Jinhong LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Myxopapillary ependymoma (MPE) is a rare tumor. Most studies have discussed the clinical symptoms and treatment of individual cases, but limited data are provided on overall survival and its influencing factors. Consequently, we aimed to further explore the epidemiological features of MPE and factors influencing overall survival. Methods: The cohort study extracted information about all patients diagnosed with intracranial MPE from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 2004-2015. Epidemiological characteristics and prognostic factors after adjustment for different variables were analyzed. Outcomes were 5- and 10-year overall survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model, with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 1,026 cases were identified in the SEER database. No significant difference was found between the incidence of total MPE and the incidence of non-malignant MPE from 2004 to 2015, and there was no incidence trend. The incidence of MPE was higher among people aged 30-34 and 45-49 years old. In 2005, 2007 and 2011, the incidence of men was greater than that of women (P<0.001). Blacks had a lower incidence than whites in years other than 2007, 2010, and 2013. The older age (older Conclusions: Age, marital status, surgery and radiotherapy are factors influencing the overall survival of MPE patients. Surgery is still the main therapeutic choice, while radiotherapy plays a negative role in the management of MPE. Therefore, prospective research is required to verify and complement our findings for MPE control.

Indexed as

epidemiologyMyxopapillary ependymoma (MPE)radiationsurgerySurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)

Identifiers

PMID39697736
PMCPMC11651771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.