ArticleJournal of hematology2024
Optimizing Falling Drop Hemoglobin Method by Comparing Capillary Versus Venous Blood and Determining the Stability of the Copper Sulfate Solution.
Article in Journal of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anemia is a global health issue that affects over 1 billion people and contributes to maternal mortality and birth defects. Low-resource, tropical areas face a dual challenge: high prevalence of anemia and inability to access affordable testing methods. The falling drop hemoglobin method has been developed by our lab to quantify hemoglobin concentration and assess anemia by timing the descent of venous blood in a column of copper sulfate solution, without using electricity or batteries. This research aimed to optimize the falling drop hemoglobin method by evaluating the use of capillary blood to reduce within sample variance and assessing copper sulfate stability to determine shelf life in expected working conditions. Methods: The falling drop hemoglobin method was performed on both venous and capillary blood samples collected directly from the fingertip by dispensing 44 µL of blood in a copper sulfate column. A microhematocrit was performed on the venous blood sample and converted mathematically to a hemoglobin level to serve as the standard. Copper sulfate stability was assessed for 32 weeks among three solutions: solution prepared fresh on day of testing, solution incubated at room temperature, and solution incubated at 37.7 °C. Results: Capillary blood yielded higher average descent times and higher standard deviations than venous blood. Collecting precisely 44 µL of capillary blood proved challenging and impractical. In copper sulfate stability testing, freshly prepared solution yielded the highest average descent time. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc testing revealed no significant difference between mean descent times of freshly prepared and 37.7 °C solutions (P = 0.26) and between room temperature and 37.7 °C solutions (P = 0.64), but a significant difference between freshly prepared and room temperature solutions (P = 0.04). Conclusions: This study found that capillary blood did not present a more accurate alternative to venous blood in the falling drop hemoglobin test, and copper sulfate did not degrade over 32 weeks at 37.7 °C. This lends support for the current use of venous blood in the test, and for use of copper sulfate solution in tropical climates, where the test is most necessary, with a shelf life of at least 32 weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.