Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39697637›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

Intravitreal Faricimab for Previously Treated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Abraham Hang, Taylor Ngo, Jaipreet Singh Virk, Kareem Moussa, Ala Moshiri, Parisa Emami-Naeini, Susanna S Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abraham HangDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Taylor NgoDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Jaipreet Singh VirkDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Kareem MoussaDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Ala MoshiriDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Parisa Emami-NaeiniDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Susanna S ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5911-6671

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To report our real-world experience using intravitreal faricimab, a novel anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy, in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) previously treated with other anti-VEGF therapy. Patients and Methods: A retrospective, single-center study of previously treated nAMD eyes treated with faricimab. Results: In 88 eyes (73 patients), mean baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/63 (range 20/20 to CF) with mean anti-VEGF injection interval of 6.1+2.0 weeks. Mean baseline central subfield thickness (CST) was 291+73 µm. During mean follow-up of 30.1+13.5 (range 7.0 to 50.3) weeks on faricimab, the eyes received an average of 5.1+2.4 injections (range 1 to 11). Mean BCVA remained at 20/63 (p=0.11), but injection interval increased to 7.4+2.6 weeks (p<0.001), and CST decreased to 262+63 µm (p<0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that higher number of different anti-VEGF drugs used at baseline was associated with a lower decrease in CST on faricimab (p=0.04) while total number of anti-VEGF injections at baseline (p=0.56) and time on faricimab (p=0.68) were not associated. Faricimab was discontinued in 23 eyes (26.1%), including 8 eyes for poor response, 2 eyes for persistent new floaters and 4 eyes for new vision decrease which reversed after stopping faricimab. Conclusion: In previously treated nAMD eyes, intravitreal faricimab was associated with increased mean treatment interval and decreased CST but no improvement in mean BCVA. The benefit of faricimab on CST reduction may be diminished in eyes previously treated with multiple different types of anti-VEGF therapy.

Indexed as

anti-VEGF therapycentral subfield thicknessintravitreal therapyoptical coherence tomographyreal-world experience

Identifiers

PMID39697637
PMCPMC11654210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.