ArticleExtracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids2024
Substrate stiffness modulates extracellular vesicles' release in a triple-negative breast cancer model.
Article in Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Multifaceted Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Effects of Intracellular Force Localization on Cancer Cell Invasion: Revealing Mechanical Trade-offs through Experimentally Validated Computational Models.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic Association of COL3A1Pain research & management · 2026Article
- 3D Nanofibrillar Matrix Stiffness Modulates Extracellular Vesicle Cargo and Pro-Tumour Functions.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The microenvironment effect on the tumoral-derived Extracellular Vesicle release, which is of significant interest for biomedical applications, still represents a rather unexplored field. The aim of the present work is to investigate the interrelation between extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness and the release of small EVs from cancer cells. Here, we focus on the interrelation between the ECM and small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), specifically investigating the unexplored aspect of the influence of ECM stiffness on the release of sEVs. Methods: We used a well-studied metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) cell line, MDA-MB-231, as a model to study the release of sEVs by cells cultured on substrates of different stiffness. We have grown MDA-MB-231 cells on two collagen-coated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates at different stiffness (0.2 and 3.6 MPa), comparing them with a hard glass substrate as control, and then we isolated the respective sEVs by differential ultracentrifugation. After checking the cell growth conditions [vitality, morphology by immunofluorescence microscopy, stiffness by atomic force microscopy (AFM)], we took advantage of a multi-parametric approach based on complementary techniques (AFM, Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis, and asymmetric flow field flow fractionation with a multi-angle light scattering detector) to characterize the TNBC-derived sEV obtained in the different substrate conditions. Results: We observe that soft substrates induce TNBC cell softening and rounding. This effect promotes the release of a high number of larger sEVs. Conclusion: Here, we show the role of ECM physical properties in the regulation of sEV release in a TNBC model. While the molecular mechanisms regulating this effect need further investigation, our report represents a step toward an improved understanding of ECM-cell-sEVs crosstalk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.