Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39697617›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2024

Why blood flow restriction cuff features are an important methodological consideration- a short commentary on "cerebral cortex activation and functional connectivity during low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction: an fNIRS study".

Nicholas Rolnick, Matthew Clarkson, Luke Hughes, Vasileios Korakakis, Victor De Queiros, Stephen D Patterson, Samuel Buckner, Tim Werner, Dahan Da Cunha Nascimento, Sten Stray-Gundersen and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nicholas RolnickThe BFR Pros, New York, NY, United States.
Matthew ClarksonInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Luke HughesDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Vasileios KorakakisDepartment of Health Sciences, PhD in Physiotherapy Program, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Victor De QueirosGraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil.
Stephen D PattersonCentre for Applied Performance Sciences, St. Mary's University Twickenham, London, United Kingdom.
Samuel BucknerUSF Muscle Laboratory, Exercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Tim WernerDepartment of Exercise Science, Salisbury University, Salisbury, MD, United States.
Dahan Da Cunha NascimentoDepartment of Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia (UCB), Brasilia, Brazil.
Sten Stray-GundersenDepartment of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States.
Okan KamişDepartment of Sports and Health, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Türkiye.
Mathias ThoelenDepartment of Physical Therapy, Anna TopSupport, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Kyle KimbrellOwens Recovery Science, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Ewoud JacobsDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

arterial occlusion pressureBFR trainingcommentarylimb occlusion pressuremulti-chambered design

Identifiers

PMID39697617
PMCPMC11652473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.