Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39697615›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2024

Predicting postoperative pulmonary infection risk in patients with diabetes using machine learning.

Chunxiu Zhao, Bingbing Xiang, Jie Zhang, Pingliang Yang, Qiaoli Liu, Shun Wang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07321262 (An Interpretable and Clinically Deployable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Early Postoperative Pneumonia of Brain Tumor), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07321262 completednot on this map

An Interpretable and Clinically Deployable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Early Postoperative Pneumonia of Brain Tumor: a Multicenter Diagnostic Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMing YangRan2024 to 2025Enrolled1,856ConditionsPostoperative Pneumonia, Brain Tumors
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chunxiu Zhao *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Bingbing Xiang *Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jie Zhang *Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Pingliang Yang *Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Qiaoli LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Shun WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with diabetes face an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary infection (PPI). However, precise predictive models specific to this patient group are lacking. Objective: To develop and validate a machine learning model for predicting PPI risk in patients with diabetes. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 1,269 patients with diabetes who underwent elective non-cardiac, non-neurological surgeries at our institution from January 2020 to December 2023. Predictive models were constructed using nine different machine learning algorithms. Feature selection was conducted using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) logistic regression. Model performance was assessed via the Area Under the Curve (AUC), precision, accuracy, specificity and F1-score. Results: The Ada Boost classifier (ADA) model exhibited the best performance with an AUC of 0.901, Accuracy of 0.91, Precision of 0.82, specificity of 0.98, PPV of 0.82, and NPV of 0.82. LASSO feature selection identified six optimal predictive factors: postoperative transfer to the ICU, Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) status, surgical department, and duration of surgery. Conclusion: Our study developed a robust predictive model using six clinical features, offering a valuable tool for clinical decision-making and personalized prevention strategies for PPI in patients with diabetes.

Indexed as

Ada Boost classifierdiabetes mellitusmachine learningpostoperative pulmonary infectionrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID39697615
PMCPMC11652664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.