ArticleFrontiers in physiology2024
Predicting postoperative pulmonary infection risk in patients with diabetes using machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07321262 (An Interpretable and Clinically Deployable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Early Postoperative Pneumonia of Brain Tumor), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Interpretable and Clinically Deployable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Early Postoperative Pneumonia of Brain Tumor: a Multicenter Diagnostic Study
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early risk stratification of postoperative pneumonia after brain tumor surgery using routine perioperative variables: development and prospective multicenter validation of an interpretable prediction model.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Risk Factors Analysis and Nomogram Prediction Model Construction for Pulmonary Infection After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with diabetes face an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary infection (PPI). However, precise predictive models specific to this patient group are lacking. Objective: To develop and validate a machine learning model for predicting PPI risk in patients with diabetes. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 1,269 patients with diabetes who underwent elective non-cardiac, non-neurological surgeries at our institution from January 2020 to December 2023. Predictive models were constructed using nine different machine learning algorithms. Feature selection was conducted using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) logistic regression. Model performance was assessed via the Area Under the Curve (AUC), precision, accuracy, specificity and F1-score. Results: The Ada Boost classifier (ADA) model exhibited the best performance with an AUC of 0.901, Accuracy of 0.91, Precision of 0.82, specificity of 0.98, PPV of 0.82, and NPV of 0.82. LASSO feature selection identified six optimal predictive factors: postoperative transfer to the ICU, Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) status, surgical department, and duration of surgery. Conclusion: Our study developed a robust predictive model using six clinical features, offering a valuable tool for clinical decision-making and personalized prevention strategies for PPI in patients with diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.