ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024
Return to Soccer After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Outcome or a Decision?
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of on-field rehabilitation on return to play and ACL re-injury risk after ACL reconstruction in football (soccer) players: A study on 401 consecutive cases.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- ACL reconstruction in football players: A nationwide Swedish registry study of anteromedial versus transtibial femoral tunnel techniques.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Young age and return to play increase the likelihood of subsequent ACL reconstruction in football players: Data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The return-to-sports rate is often used as an outcome measure after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Although most soccer players want to return to sports after their ACL injury, up to 40% do not believe they will return to soccer after their ACL injury. Purpose: To investigate whether self-reported presurgical beliefs regarding return to soccer correspond to registered official match participation after ACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Included were soccer players with a primary unilateral ACL injury who were ≥15 years at the time of ACLR and who had completed a presurgical question about their future sports participation beliefs. ACLR surgical data were extracted from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry, and game participation data were extracted from the Swedish Football Association's administrative data system. Results: A total of 959 soccer players (617 [64%] male and 342 [36%] female) were included. The follow-up time after ACLR ranged from 18 months to 5.5 years. Of 720 soccer players (75%) who believed that they would return to play (RTP), 462 (64%) players actually did. Of the players who believed that they would not RTP, 181 (76%) did not. Presurgical beliefs predicted RTP (odds ratio [OR], 5.59; Conclusion: The findings indicated that presurgical beliefs, age, and level of play helped to predict the actual RTP of soccer players after ACLR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.