ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024
Assessing Femoral Anteversion in Patients With Bilateral Recurrent Patellar Dislocations.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-Dependent Susceptibility to Mechanical Unloading-Induced Femoral Morphological Changes and Patellar Instability in a Rat Model.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026Article
- Predisposing Anatomical Patellofemoral Factors for Subsequent Patellar Dislocation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: After first-time lateral patellar dislocation, 44% to 70% of patients sustain redislocations. Increased femoral anteversion (FA) is considered to result in increased lateralizing forces on the patella, which might predispose one to patellar instability. When recurrent patellar dislocations (RPDs) are bilateral, it is unclear if the FA is even more increased. Hypothesis: Patients with bilateral RPD would have greater FA than patients with unilateral RPD. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 52 skeletally mature patients with RPD and a clinical suspicion of rotational malalignment underwent rotational computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. The uni- or bilaterality of the RPD was determined. A control group comprising 54 adult patients with trauma underwent computed tomography of both lower extremities as part of a multitrauma protocol. The FA values of both lower extremities were evaluated separately. Results: In total, 20 of 52 (38.5%) patients in the study group had a history of unilateral RPD and 32 of 52 (61.5%) patients had a bilateral RPD diagnosis. The mean FA of the asymptomatic limb in unilaterally symptomatic patients was 18.0° (SD, 11.2°; range, 0.5°-40.0°; median, 16.5°). In the symptomatic limb, the mean FA was 19.2° (SD, 9.1°; range, 2.0°-33.0°; median, 19.0°) (mean difference, 1.2°; 95% CI -1.3° to 3.8°). In bilaterally symptomatic patients, the mean FA on the right side was 23.2°, and 22.5° on the left. The mean differences between the symptomatic limbs in the unilateral RPD group and the right or left limbs in the bilateral RPD group were 4.0° ( Conclusion: Patients with bilateral RPD have bilaterally greater FA than patients without a history of RPD. Patients with unilateral RPD have greater FA on both sides compared with the control group without a history of lateral patellar dislocation. No statistically significant difference of FA can be seen between patients with bilateral or unilateral RPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.