ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024
Comparison of In-Game Trunk and Upper Extremity Kinematics Between Fastballs, Breaking Balls, and Changeups in NCAA Division I Collegiate Baseball Pitchers.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous biomechanical analyses of baseball pitching report similar kinematics between pitch types. However, prior studies were conducted in a controlled laboratory environment. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study aimed to compare in-game trunk and upper extremity kinematics between fastballs, breaking balls, and changeups to determine whether there are kinematic differences that may affect performance as well as to provide new insights into potential risk factors for injury. It was hypothesized that there would be kinematic differences between pitch types. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of markerless motion capture data collected during National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I baseball games. Included were 34 pitchers who pitched at least 3 pitches of each type (fastball, breaking ball, changeup) during competition. A 1-way repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to test differences between pitch types, and Bonferroni post hoc tests were used to test pairwise comparisons. Results: The MANOVA revealed a significant effect of pitch type ( Conclusion: Collegiate baseball pitchers displayed numerous kinematic differences between pitch types during competitive play, some of which are known influencers of pitching kinetics. Clinical Relevance: This study offers a novel perspective regarding kinematic differences between different pitch types during competition. These results are comparable to the findings of laboratory studies and provide valuable insights into potential injury mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.