ArticleSafety and health at work2024
Data Mining Implementations for Determining Root Causes and Precautions of Occupational Accidents in Underground Hard Coal Mining.
Article in Safety and health at work, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Data-Driven Analysis of Work-Related Accidents in the Brazilian Mining Sector (2019-2022).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Investigation of Occupational Health and Safety Levels in Genetic Disease Centers in Istanbul.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nowadays, as in every branch of industry, a large amount of data can be collected in mining, both in productivity and occupational safety. It is increasingly essential to transform this data into useful information for enterprises. Data mining is very useful in processing and extracting useful information from the processed data. This study aims to analyze the data of occupational accidents with injuries between 2010 and 2021 in an underground hard coal mine by data mining. Methods: The injured accident data for the relevant years were organized and analyzed using data mining algorithms. These algorithms were implemented with the WEKA data mining program, an open-source application. Results: According to different test methods, k-Nearest Neighborhood and Support Vector Machine algorithms succeeded in classification and prediction. The k-Nearest Neighborhood and Support Vector Machine algorithms achieved 100% (training set) and 66% (cross-validation) performance, respectively, according to two different test methods. One of the critical phases of the study is the determination of the attributes and subclasses that are effective in the origin of accidents by association rules mining. Thus, more detailed information was obtained about the root causes of the accidents. A result of Apriori and Predictive Apriori implementations revealed that the root causes of occupational accidents according to the accident locations are the worker experience, the working hours in the shift, and the worker position. In addition, shifts, accident causes, especially monthly production, and monthly wages were also influential. Conclusions: These results are also in accordance with the actual situation in the enterprise. As a result of the research, practical suggestions were presented for evaluating occupational accidents and taking precautions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.