Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39697306›Full record

ArticleSafety and health at work2024

Determination of Medical Faculty Clinical Students' Attitudes Towards Patient Safety: A Mixed Design Study.

Yasemin Güner, Kübra Yilmaz, Dilan Yurtseven, Tuğçe Mümin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Safety and health at work, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yasemin GünerKaradeniz Technical University, Medical Faculty, Department of Medical Education, Turkey.
Kübra YilmazKaradeniz Technical University, Medical Faculty, Turkey.
Dilan YurtsevenKaradeniz Technical University, Medical Faculty, Turkey.
Tuğçe MüminKaradeniz Technical University, Medical Faculty, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The study was planned to determine the attitudes of medical faculty students in clinics toward patient safety. Methods: It is a mixed-design study using quantitative and qualitative methods. The "student information form" and the "Attitudes toward Patient Safety Culture Questionnaire (APSQ)" created using "Google Forms" were e-mailed to clinical students of the medical faculty. Quantitative data were collected from 125 students. Then, semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with six students from each class. The data were obtained through video and audio recordings of the 45-minute interviews through the Zoom program. Results: According to the results, 86% of the 125 students did not receive any training on patient safety. The total score of the students on the APSQ was 94.87 ± 14.32. Six main themes and twenty sub-themes emerged from the qualitative data. The main themes are students' awareness of patient safety, students' misconceptions about "patient safety," students' knowledge about the scope of patient safety, students' experiences with medical errors, deficiencies in educational processes on patient safety, and suggestions for educational approaches to patient safety. Conclusions: After completing undergraduate medical education, physicians typically assume roles as general practitioners in various healthcare settings, such as hospital's emergency departments, home care, or community health centers. The lack of awareness among medical students about patient safety is a significant concern that needs to be addressed. As stakeholders in their education, students recognize the importance of being well-prepared to provide safe and effective patient care in their future roles as physicians.

Indexed as

medical educationmedical errormedical studentpatient safety

Identifiers

PMID39697306
PMCPMC11650796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.