Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39697225›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024

Updates in novel immunotherapeutic strategies for relapsed/refractory AML.

Sawyer Bawek, Sayuri Gurusinghe, Matthew Burwinkel, Amanda Przespolewski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sawyer BawekDepartment of Internal Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Sayuri GurusingheDepartment of Internal Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Matthew BurwinkelDepartment of Internal Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Amanda PrzespolewskiLeukemia Service, Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a severe hematological malignancy with poor outcomes, particularly in older adults. Traditional treatment options like high-dose chemotherapy often lead to refractory or relapsed AML, with even worse outcomes. New therapies for relapsed and refractory AML are needed, and this review explores the most recent advancements in immunotherapy in AML. Checkpoint Inhibitors utilizing innate or adaptive immune targeting have shown potential to improve AML outcomes when combined with hypomethylating agents and chemotherapy. The use of adoptive cell therapy in AML demonstrates promising early data, however, there is a need for better target selection. Although early in development, both vaccine therapy as well as stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonists have potential to enhance the innate immune response to overcome AML's immune evasion. Immunotherapy has become a promising approach for AML treatment, especially in refractory and relapsed AML, especially in patients who are not eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplants. Future research should focus on a deeper understanding of the immune microenvironment to identify the most critical targets for optimization, as well as personalized therapeutic combination strategies. Here we present a comprehensive overview of the recent developments in immunotherapy for relapsed and refractory AML.

Indexed as

acute myeloid leukemiaCAR-Tcellular therapyimmunotherapyrelapsed/refractory

Identifiers

PMID39697225
PMCPMC11652486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.