ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2024
Severe bilateral subcutaneous emphysema after prophylactic treatment: a case report.
Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dental Procedure-Related Emphysema: A Scoping Review of Clinical Presentation, Anatomical Distribution, Management, and Outcomes.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Subcutaneous Emphysema Following Periodontal Interventions: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Clinical Considerations.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subcutaneous emphysema is the accumulation of gas or air in loose subcutaneous connective tissue. The use of air-driven handpieces in dental procedures is a common iatrogenic cause of intraoral mucogingival barrier disruption by high-pressure air. This case report describes a 60-year-old woman who underwent prophylactic periodontal treatment with an air-abrasive device and subsequently developed severe bilateral subcutaneous emphysema, extending from the temporal region to the thoracic and mediastinal spaces. Subcutaneous emphysema was suspected based on clinical examination, and paranasal CT was performed for definitive diagnosis. Chest CT was conducted for further evaluation, followed by consultation with the Department of Thoracic Surgery. The patient was admitted for supportive care and prophylactic antibiotics. After 4 days of hospitalization, the symptoms had nearly resolved, and a follow-up paranasal CT showed significant air resorption. The patient was discharged without complications. Although generally benign and self-limiting, subcutaneous emphysema can lead to serious complications such as systemic infection, pneumothorax, and air embolism. This case highlights the importance of prompt diagnosis and appropriate management to prevent further complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.