Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39697161›Full record

SynthesisPsychophysiology2025

Preprocessing choices for P3 analyses with mobile EEG: A systematic literature review and interactive exploration.

Nadine S J Jacobsen, Daniel Kristanto, Suong Welp, Yusuf Cosku Inceler, Stefan Debener

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nadine S J JacobsenNeuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6612-7328
Daniel KristantoPsychological Methods and Statistics Division, Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Suong WelpNeuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Yusuf Cosku IncelerPsychological Methods and Statistics Division, Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Stefan DebenerNeuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DE 779/8-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preprocessing is necessary to extract meaningful results from electroencephalography (EEG) data. With many possible preprocessing choices, their impact on outcomes is fundamental. While previous studies have explored the effects of preprocessing on stationary EEG data, this research delves into mobile EEG, where complex processing is necessary to address motion artifacts. Specifically, we describe the preprocessing choices studies reported for analyzing the P3 event-related potential (ERP) during walking and standing. A systematic review of 258 studies of the P3 during walking, identified 27 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Two independent coders extracted preprocessing choices reported in each study. Analysis of preprocessing choices revealed commonalities and differences, such as the widespread use of offline filters but limited application of line noise correction (3 of 27 studies). Notably, 59% of studies involved manual processing steps, and 56% omitted reporting critical parameters for at least one step. All studies employed unique preprocessing strategies. These findings align with stationary EEG preprocessing results, emphasizing the necessity for standardized reporting in mobile EEG research. We implemented an interactive visualization tool (Shiny app) to aid the exploration of the preprocessing landscape. The app allows users to structure the literature regarding different processing steps, enter planned processing methods, and compare them with the literature. The app could be utilized to examine how these choices impact P3 results and understand the robustness of various processing options. We hope to increase awareness regarding the potential influence of preprocessing decisions and advocate for comprehensive reporting standards to foster reproducibility in mobile EEG research.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEvent-Related Potentials, P300Mobile ApplicationsHumansSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedWalkingEEGelectroencephalographymobilepreprocessingshiny appsystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID39697161
PMCPMC11656290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.