ArticleHead & neck2025
A Novel Training Model to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy of Cervical Fine-Needle Aspiration.
Article in Head & neck, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis study aims to improve the diagnostic yield of cervical fine-needle aspiration (FNA) through training on a novel liver model. Ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) is crucial for diagnosing head and neck lumps but requires meticulous execution. Limited resources often hinder systematic teaching, making practical models essential for training.
methodsFifteen otorhinolaryngology residents trained using a liver model with inserted Sensorium spheres to simulate cervical masses. The training involved viewing an instructional video, performing US-FNA on the model, and completing pre- and posttraining self-assessments. Performance was evaluated using visual analog scales (VAS), an adapted version of objective structured assessment of ultrasound skills (adapted OSAUS), and timing of procedures. Clinical impact was assessed by comparing diagnostic rates of US-FNA before and after training.
resultsParticipants reported increased comfort and proficiency in US-FNA techniques posttraining. Adapted OSAUS scores improved significantly for image recognition and both in-plane and out-of-plane techniques. The diagnostic yield of US-FNA in clinical practice increased from 71% to 85%. No significant influence of gender, preferred ultrasound orientation, age, or experience on the learning curve was found. However, male participants showed a more substantial benefit from the training.
conclusionThe liver model effectively enhances US-FNA skills, reflected in improved clinical diagnostic rates. Training on such models should be incorporated into medical education to reduce inconclusive punctures and enhance patient satisfaction. This study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of a cost-efficient, reproducible model for US-FNA training, emphasizing the importance of practical training in medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.