Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696940›Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced nursing2025

An Integrative Review of Specialised Nursing Career Frameworks to Develop a Nursing Career Framework for Registered Nurses Working in Aged Care.

Sachini Thennakoon, Seng Giap Marcus Ang, Victoria Traynor, Karen Strickland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sachini ThennakoonSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1949-3496
Seng Giap Marcus AngSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2617-6261
Victoria TraynorSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.
Karen StricklandSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3123-8778

Funding

DVCR strategic doctoral research scholarship offered by Edith Cowan University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study is to synthesise literature on specialised nursing career frameworks to inform the development of an aged care nursing career framework.

designAn integrative review was conducted.

methodThe review followed Whittemore and Knafl's five-step integrative review method. To appraise the quality of the studies, the Quality Appraisal for Diverse Studies tool for peer-reviewed articles and the ACCODS (Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, and Significance) checklist for grey literature were used. Data were extracted and synthesised using the constant comparison method. DATA SOURCE: The electronic databases of CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO and Google Scholar were searched to identify peer-reviewed articles and grey literature reporting on specialised nursing career frameworks for registered nurses.

resultsEight studies were reviewed, and the findings were presented corresponding to each of the three research questions of the review. First, the research methods adopted to develop specialised nursing career frameworks were described based on the research design, stakeholder involvement and data collection methods. Second, the key elements of specialised nursing career frameworks were identified as career pathways, nursing competencies and roles and progression between the career levels. Third, the findings suggested that the key purposes for developing specialised nursing career frameworks are to improve professional development, recruitment and retention and to promote consistency and quality in nursing practice.

conclusionThe study highlights a significant gap in the evidence base of career frameworks for registered nurses in aged care, emphasising the need for future research. This review answered three research questions: methods for developing specialised nursing career frameworks, their key components and main purposes, providing insights to guide healthcare organisations and researchers. The findings indicate that career frameworks are primarily intended to promote knowledge and skills development and may also to bolster recruitment and retention rates, and support nurses' career advancement, but there is limited evidence on implementation, evaluation and sustainability. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: The findings will guide healthcare organisations and future researchers with methods and techniques to develop specialised nursing career frameworks. Implementing a specialised nursing career framework in aged care could enhance continuous professional development, recruitment, retention and career progression among nurses. IMPACT: Nursing career frameworks have been widely applied to address professional development and retention objectives. However, there is limited evidence available to formulate a career framework for registered nurses working in aged care. The review identified the research methods adopted to develop specialised nursing career frameworks along with the key elements of specialised nursing career frameworks. These findings will guide employers and future researchers in developing evidence-based aged-care nursing career frameworks. Additionally, the findings will guide registered nurses in using career frameworks as a tool to facilitate career advancement and competency development. Furthermore, the review recognised the key purposes for developing specialised nursing career frameworks, suggesting that the meaningful adoption of career frameworks could be utilised as a strategic approach for enhancing retention and workforce development of the aged care workforce. REPORTING

methodThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was used for reporting. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

trial registrationThe integrative review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews database (registration no: CRD42022354728).

Indexed as

Career ChoiceCareer MobilityGeriatric NursingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle Agedaged carecareer frameworkcareer pathwaycareer progressioncompetency frameworkintegrative reviewnursingnursing homesprofessional developmentretention

Identifiers

PMID39696940
PMCPMC12271661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.