Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696898›Full record

ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2025

SciAgents: Automating Scientific Discovery Through Bioinspired Multi-Agent Intelligent Graph Reasoning.

Alireza Ghafarollahi, Markus J Buehler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Sustainable Materials Design With Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. LLM-driven design of physics-constrained constitutive models: Two agents are better than one.Machine learning for computational science and engineering · 2026
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alireza GhafarollahiLaboratory for Atomistic and Molecular Mechanics (LAMM), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Markus J BuehlerLaboratory for Atomistic and Molecular Mechanics (LAMM), Center for Computational Science and Engineering, Schwarzman College of Computing, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4173-9659

Funding

Models to Predict Protein Biomaterial PerformanceU01EB014976 · NIBIB · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI BUEHLER, MARKUS J., KAPLAN, DAVID L. · 2012 to 2020
$5.2M
Strain Analysis Software for Open ScienceR01AR077793 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Guy M Genin, Stavros Thomopoulos · 2020 to 2026
$5.2M
ARO 79058LSCSBARO W911NF2120130ARO W911NF-22-2-0213DOE-SERDP WP22-S1-3475MIT-IBM Watson AI LabNIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR077793NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB014976NIH HHS R01AR077793NIH HHS U01EB014976Swiss National Science Foundation #P500PT_214448USDA 2021-69012-35978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key challenge in artificial intelligence (AI) is the creation of systems capable of autonomously advancing scientific understanding by exploring novel domains, identifying complex patterns, and uncovering previously unseen connections in vast scientific data. In this work, SciAgents, an approach that leverages three core concepts is presented: (1) large-scale ontological knowledge graphs to organize and interconnect diverse scientific concepts, (2) a suite of large language models (LLMs) and data retrieval tools, and (3) multi-agent systems with in-situ learning capabilities. Applied to biologically inspired materials, SciAgents reveals hidden interdisciplinary relationships that were previously considered unrelated, achieving a scale, precision, and exploratory power that surpasses human research methods. The framework autonomously generates and refines research hypotheses, elucidating underlying mechanisms, design principles, and unexpected material properties. By integrating these capabilities in a modular fashion, the system yields material discoveries, critiques and improves existing hypotheses, retrieves up-to-date data about existing research, and highlights strengths and limitations. This is achieved by harnessing a "swarm of intelligence" similar to biological systems, providing new avenues for discovery. How this model accelerates the development of advanced materials by unlocking Nature's design principles, resulting in a new biocomposite with enhanced mechanical properties and improved sustainability through energy-efficient production is shown.

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligencebio‐inspired materialsbiological designknowledge graphlarge language modelmaterials designmulti‐agent systemnatural language processingscientific AI

Identifiers

PMID39696898
PMCPMC12138853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.