Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696757›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuropsychology2025

Can machine learning assist us in the classification of older patients suffering from dementia based on classic neuropsychological tests and a new financial capacity test performance?

Vaitsa Giannouli, Stylianos Kampakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuropsychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vaitsa GiannouliHellenic Open University, Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2176-8986
Stylianos KampakisLondon Business School, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPredicting the diagnosis of an older adult solely based on their financial capacity performance or other neuropsychological test performance is still an open question. The aim of this study is to highlight which tests are of importance in diagnostic protocols by using recent advancements in machine learning.

methodsFor this reason, a neuropsychological battery was administered in 543 older Greek patients already diagnosed with different types of neurocognitive disorders along with a test specifically measuring financial capacity, that is, Legal Capacity for Property Law Transactions Assessment Scale (LCPLTAS). The battery was analysed using a random forest algorithm. The objective was to predict whether an older person suffers from dementia. The algorithm's performance was tested through cross-validation.

resultsMachine learning was applied for the first time in data analysis regarding financial capacity and three factors-tests were revealed as the best predictors: two subscales from the LCPLTAS measuring 'financial decision making' and 'cash transactions', and the widely used MMSE which measures general cognition. The algorithm demonstrated good performance as measured by the F1-score, which is a measure of the harmonic mean of precision and recall. This evaluation metric in binary and multi-class classification integrates precision and recall into a single metric to gain a better understanding of model performance.

conclusionsThese findings reveal the importance of focusing on these scales and tests in neuropsychological assessment protocols. Future research may clarify in other cultural settings if the same variables are of importance.

Indexed as

DementiaMachine LearningNeuropsychological TestsAgedAged, 80 and overDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaledementiafinancial capacitymachine learningneuropsychological assessment

Identifiers

PMID39696757
PMCPMC12424109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.