ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2024
1,2-DCA biodegradation potential of an aquifer assessed in situ and in aerobic and anaerobic microcosms.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) biodegradation can occur through aerobic or anaerobic pathways that can be exploited in bioremediation strategies. Bioremediation interventions are site specific and generally based on anaerobic pathways, nevertheless expanding knowledge on proper conditions favoring the biodegradation and especially on 1,2-DCA degrading microorganisms is crucial. In this work the intrinsic biodegradation potential of an aquifer impacted by Chlorinated Aliphatic Hydrocarbons (mainly 1,2-DCA) was evaluated by characterizing the aquifer microbiome across space and time and by setting up biostimulation treatments in microcosms under different aerobic and anaerobic conditions, in parallel.
resultsThe microbial profiling of the aquifer revealed noticeable alpha and beta diversity across the sampling sites within the aquifer and strong fluctuations over time. Surprisingly both the anaerobic and aerobic biostimulation treatments led to the successful removal of 1,2-DCA in microcosms, the enrichment of known 1,2-DCA degraders and the detection of reductive or hydrolytic dehalogenases. Ancylobacter and Starkeya were enriched in aerobic microcosms. Desulfovibrio and Desulfuromonas, known as perchloroethylene degraders, were enriched in anaerobic microcosms, suggesting they could be yet unknown 1,2-DCA respirers.
conclusionsOur results demonstrate the occurrence of both aerobic and anaerobic bioremediation potential in the aquifer despite its negative redox potential. Due to the feasibility of direct oxidation with oxygen insufflation, we propose that an enhanced bioremediation strategy based on direct oxidation of 1,2-DCA could be applied to the contaminated aquifer as an ecofriendly, efficient and cost-effective approach as an alternative to anaerobic biodegradation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.