SynthesisEuropean journal of medical research2024
Characteristics, opportunities, and challenges of osteopathy (COCO) in the perceptions of osteopaths in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland: a metasynthesis.
Synthesis in European journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Twenty years of university-graduated osteopaths in Belgium: A cross-sectional survey.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe practice of osteopathy in Europe is not uniformly regulated. Even despite the topographical and cultural proximity, the regulation of the osteopathic profession also differs in the German-speaking countries. In contrast to Germany and Austria, both without any recognized osteopathic profession, Switzerland has already created legal regulations for the practice of osteopathy. The aim of this analysis and the project itself is to gain knowledge about the characteristics, challenges and opportunities of osteopaths in German-speaking countries.
methodsThe COCO project examines osteopaths in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, considering their view on the practice of osteopathy. Within the framework of a metasynthesis, a systematic literature search was conducted first to identify further relevant studies. Subsequently, a qualitative synthesis was followed after having applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria to the literature found.
resultsThis study was able to draw on a total of 30 content-analyzed interviews with osteopaths. It was possible to gain deeper insights into the characteristics, challenges and opportunities of osteopaths in German-speaking countries. Challenges were diagnosed, for example, regarding professional identity, as well as in the intraprofessional conflicts and the question of standards in training and research. The chances were described as leading a fulfilling professional life and meeting a great interest in osteopathy among the population.
conclusionsRegarding the characteristics of osteopathy in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, it can be said that osteopaths have difficulties to define osteopathy. The resources mentioned most often are manual work on the patient, a holistic treatment approach and generous treatment durations. Lecturers and prominent figures can be seen as role models and greatly influence the perspective of osteopaths. The central challenge is the problem of identity among osteopaths. In addition, different training programs and qualifications exist, which also presents the greatest country-specific differences. The satisfaction of osteopaths in their work and the extreme demand for osteopathy in society should be seen as an opportunity for the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.