Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696652›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2024

Migratory movements of bats are shaped by barrier effects, sex-biased timing and the adaptive use of winds.

Sander Lagerveld, Pepijn de Vries, Jane Harris, Sue Parsons, Elisabeth Debusschere, Ommo Hüppop, Vera Brust, Heiko Schmaljohann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Conservation-focused mapping of avian migratory routes using a pan-European automated telemetry network.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sander LagerveldWageningen University & Research, Ankerpark 27, Den Helder, NL-1781 AG, The Netherlands. sander.lagerveld@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1291-4021
Pepijn de VriesWageningen University & Research, Ankerpark 27, Den Helder, NL-1781 AG, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7961-6646
Jane HarrisKepwick Ecological Services, Kepwick Cottage, Wymondham Road, East Carleton, Norfolk, NR14 8JB, UK.
Sue ParsonsNorfolk and Norwich Bat Group, Norwich, UK.
Elisabeth DebusschereFlanders Marine Institute, Jacobsenstraat 1, Oostende, 8400, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5595-0295
Ommo HüppopInstitute of Avian Research, An der Vogelwarte 21, 26382, Wilhelmshaven, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7048-3747
Vera BrustInstitute of Avian Research, An der Vogelwarte 21, 26382, Wilhelmshaven, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4128-4495
Heiko SchmaljohannInstitute of Biology and Environmental Science, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0886-4319

Funding

Bundesamt für Naturschutz BMUV; grants. no 351582210A / 351986140ADeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHM 2647/3-1, SCHM 2647/4-1, SCHM 2647/7-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigratory bats perform seasonal movements between their summer and winter areas. When crossing ecological barriers, like the open sea, they are exposed to an increased mortality risk due to energetically demanding long-distance flights and unexpected inclement weather events. How such barriers affect bat migratory movements is still poorly known.

methodsTo study bat migration patterns in response to an ecological barrier, we tagged 44 Nathusius' pipistrelles Pipistrellus nathusii with radio-transmitters on the East coast of the United Kingdom (UK) in spring 2021 and 2022. Subsequently, we assessed their movements to continental Europe using the MOTUS Wildlife Tracking System. We investigated route selection, timing of migration, overall migration speed and the influence of wind on airspeed, groundspeed and flight altitude during migratory overseas flights.

resultsBarrier effects cause migratory movements along the coast, and crossings over sea are shortened by deviating from the general migration direction. Males depart from the UK later in the season compared to females. The overall migration speed of females was 61 km/day and 88 km/day after their last detection in the UK. Our estimated airspeeds during oversea flights correspond well with airspeeds measured in a wind tunnel. Bats use wind adaptively to reduce airspeed when flying under tailwind and increase airspeed when flying under crosswind conditions. Departures over sea coincidence with tailwinds, enabling bats to more than double their airspeed, reaching ground speeds of up to 16.8 m/s (60.5 km/h). Our analysis suggests that bats select altitudes with favourable wind conditions and that they seek altitudes of several hundred meters, possibly extending up to 2,500 m. Low-altitude migration occurs when wind conditions are less favourable.

conclusionsOur study demonstrates that bat migratory movements are highly influenced by barrier effects, sex-biased timing of migration and the adaptive use of winds. The results of our study contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the decision-making process and adaptations bats employ during their migration. Elucidating bat migration patterns will enable us to develop effective conservation measures, for example in relation to the development and operation of coastal and offshore wind farms.

Indexed as

Bat migrationFlight elevationMigration speedMOTUS wildlife tracking systemNathusius’ pipistrelleNorth SeaWind farmsWind selectivity

Identifiers

PMID39696652
PMCPMC11657297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.