ArticleArthritis research & therapy2024
XGBoost-SHAP-based interpretable diagnostic framework for knee osteoarthritis: a population-based retrospective cohort study.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening: insights from risk stratification, guidelines, and emerging technologies-a systematic review.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Cerebral blood flow alterations and machine learning classification in chronic low back pain using multi-PLD ASL radiomics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- UbiQTree: Uncertainty quantification in XAI with tree ensembles.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of an interpretable machine learning model using first-24-h postpartum nursing variables to predict delayed lactogenesis II after cesarean delivery.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A multiscale geospatial analysis integrating explainable machine learning to characterize spatial disparities in melanoma mortality associated with environmental justice and healthcare access in the contiguous United States.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning to predict prolonged post-operative opioid use in rotator cuff patients.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Integrated liquid biopsy model for predicting metastasis and guiding PD-1 therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Machine learning approach for the prediction of 30-day mortality in patients with sepsis-associated delirium.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo use routine demographic and clinical data to develop an interpretable individual-level machine learning (ML) model to diagnose knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and to identify highly ranked features.
methodsIn this retrospective, population-based cohort study, anonymized questionnaire data was retrieved from the Wu Chuan KOA Study, Inner Mongolia, China. After feature selections, participants were divided in a 7:3 ratio into training and test sets. Class balancing was applied to the training set for data augmentation. Four ML classifiers were compared by cross-validation within the training set and their performance was further analyzed with an unseen test set. Classifications were evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, area under the curve(AUC), G-means, and F1 scores. The best model was explained using Shapley values to extract highly ranked features.
resultsA total of 1188 participants were investigated in this study, among whom 26.3% were diagnosed with KOA. Comparatively, XGBoost with Boruta exhibited the highest classification performance among the four models, with an AUC of 0.758, G-means of 0.800, and F1 scores of 0.703. The SHAP method reveals the top 17 features of KOA according to the importance ranking, and the average of the experience of joint pain was recognized as the most important features.
conclusionsOur study highlights the usefulness of machine learning in unveiling important factors that influence the diagnosis of KOA to guide new prevention strategies. Further work is needed to validate this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.