Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696605›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2024

XGBoost-SHAP-based interpretable diagnostic framework for knee osteoarthritis: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Zijuan Fan, Wenzhu Song, Yan Ke, Ligan Jia, Songyan Li, Jiao Jiao Li, Yuqing Zhang, Jianhao Lin, Bin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zijuan Fan *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Qingchun Road No. 79, Hangzhou, China.
Wenzhu Song *Department of Big Data in Health Science School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yan Ke *Arthritis Clinic & Research Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ligan JiaSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumchi, China.
Songyan LiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Qingchun Road No. 79, Hangzhou, China.
Jiao Jiao LiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Yuqing ZhangHarvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts, USA.
Jianhao LinArthritis Clinic & Research Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China. linjianhao@pkuph.edu.cn.
Bin WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Qingchun Road No. 79, Hangzhou, China. wangbin_pku@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

Alibaba Cloud G2022010-18National Natural Science Foundation of China 81802204Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LTGY23H060007Zhejiang Medical and Health Science and Technology Project 2023RC010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo use routine demographic and clinical data to develop an interpretable individual-level machine learning (ML) model to diagnose knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and to identify highly ranked features.

methodsIn this retrospective, population-based cohort study, anonymized questionnaire data was retrieved from the Wu Chuan KOA Study, Inner Mongolia, China. After feature selections, participants were divided in a 7:3 ratio into training and test sets. Class balancing was applied to the training set for data augmentation. Four ML classifiers were compared by cross-validation within the training set and their performance was further analyzed with an unseen test set. Classifications were evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, area under the curve(AUC), G-means, and F1 scores. The best model was explained using Shapley values to extract highly ranked features.

resultsA total of 1188 participants were investigated in this study, among whom 26.3% were diagnosed with KOA. Comparatively, XGBoost with Boruta exhibited the highest classification performance among the four models, with an AUC of 0.758, G-means of 0.800, and F1 scores of 0.703. The SHAP method reveals the top 17 features of KOA according to the importance ranking, and the average of the experience of joint pain was recognized as the most important features.

conclusionsOur study highlights the usefulness of machine learning in unveiling important factors that influence the diagnosis of KOA to guide new prevention strategies. Further work is needed to validate this approach.

Indexed as

Machine LearningOsteoarthritis, KneeAdultAgedChinaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesBorutaClassificationKnee osteoarthritisMachine learningSHAPXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID39696605
PMCPMC11657490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.