Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696600›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2024

Canine vector-borne parasites in the Galapagos.

Carla Andreea Culda, Nathalie G Tejena Rodriguez, Fortunato Puleo, Rafael M Polit Sosa, Luciana Cătălina Panait, Cristina Daniela Cazan, Georgiana Deak, Renato Leon, Rommel Lenin Vinueza, Diego Páez-Rosas and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Geographical Distribution and Molecular Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. PatentParasitology · 2025
    Article
  5. First Report ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2025
    Article
  6. High prevalence ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Carla Andreea CuldaDepartment of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. carla-andreea.culda@usamvcluj.ro.
Nathalie G Tejena RodriguezUniversidad Regional Amazonica Ikiam, Tena, Ecuador.
Fortunato PuleoFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" of Timișoara, Timișoara, Romania.
Rafael M Polit SosaEscuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Cumbayá, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Luciana Cătălina PanaitDepartment of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Cristina Daniela CazanDepartment of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Georgiana DeakDepartment of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Renato LeonLaboratorio de Entomología Médica & Medicina Tropical LEMMT, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Rommel Lenin VinuezaEscuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Cumbayá, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Diego Páez-RosasUniversidad San Francisco de Quito, Galapagos Science Center, Puerto Baquerizo Moreno, Isla San Cristóbal, Ecuador.
Andrei Daniel MihalcaDepartment of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. amihalca@usamvcluj.ro.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe extraordinary Galapagos Islands, with an impressive number of endemic and native species, maintain the interest and curiosity for researchers from all over the world. The native species are known to be vulnerable to new pathogens, cointroduced with their invasive hosts. In the case of invasive parasitic arthropods, their evolutionary success is related to the association with other invasive hosts (such as domestic animals). These associations could become a significant driver of change, as occasionally they can seek another hosts and have the capacity to transmit pathogens between domestic and wild animals. The current study aims to identify the distribution and abundance of canine vector-borne parasites in the Galapagos Islands based on the possibility that some of them could spill over to endemic mammals.

methodsA total of 1221 blood samples were randomly collected from privately owned dogs on San Cristóbal, Isabela, Santa Cruz, and Floreana Islands during the years 2021 and 2022. All samples were examined for vector-borne pathogens using the modified Knott's test and conventional, nested, and multiplex polymerase chain reactions (PCRs), followed by sequencing.

resultsThe PCR and Knott tests confirmed the presence of Dirofilaria immitis (2%, 25/1221) in all islands. While molecular analyses showed heartworm DNA only in dogs from the San Cristóbal (3.3%) and Isabela (2.4%) Islands. Moreover, other pathogens Babesia vogeli (3%, 37/1221) and Hepatozoon canis (0.2%, 2/1221) were detected for the first time by molecular analyses.

conclusionsDogs from Galapagos are hosts to various pathogens, of which some are potentially zoonotic while some other could be spill-over to endemic endangered carnivores, such as sea lions. To understand and limit their impact, long-term surveillance, control, and awareness is needed.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesVector Borne DiseasesAnimalsBabesiaDirofilaria immitisDirofilariasisDisease VectorsDogsEcuadorDomestic dogsEndemic speciesHeartwormInvasive speciesMolecular biology

Identifiers

PMID39696600
PMCPMC11656949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.