Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696589›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024

Intra-articular injection of exosomes derived from different stem cells in animal models of osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta- analysis.

Yajie Kong, Yuzhong Wang, Yujia Yang, Yu Hou, Jingjing Yu, Meiling Liu, Siyi Xie, Yongzhou Song

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Effects of exosomes from different origins on osteoclasts.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Engineered Extracellular Vesicles in Arthritic Diseases: Therapeutic Applications & Challenges.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yajie KongDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China.
Yuzhong WangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China.
Yujia YangHebei Medical University National University of Ireland Galway Stem Cell Research Center, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050017, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China.
Yu HouHebei Medical University National University of Ireland Galway Stem Cell Research Center, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050017, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China.
Jingjing YuHebei Medical University National University of Ireland Galway Stem Cell Research Center, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050017, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China.
Meiling LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China.
Siyi XieDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China.
Yongzhou SongDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China. yongzhousong@hebmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Hebei Province Key R&D Plan Project 22377752DHebei Provincial Medical Research Project 20210934Medical Science Research Project of Hebei Province 20230486Scientific Research Fund of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University 2HC202210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, the increasing incidence of osteoarthritis (OA) has attracted widespread public attention; however, the available effective treatments are limited. As a result, new therapeutic approaches, including stem cell and exosome therapies, have been proposed and are gradually gaining popularity. Because exosomes are immunocompatible, there is thought to be more potential for their use in clinical settings. This study summarizes the efficacy of exosomes in the treatment of OA.

methodsIn total, we conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases using medical subject headings terms to identify studies published from their inception until November 2023 that investigated the use of stem cell-derived exosomes in treating OA. We focused on specific outcomes including osteophyte score, chondrocyte count, pain level, qPCR and histological assessments such as the OARSI (Osteoarthritis research society international) score to measure cartilage degeneration. For data extraction, we used GetData Graph Digitizer to retrieve values from graphs, and the meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. We chose mean difference (MD) as the primary effect measure since all included studies reported the same outcomes. Ultimately, 20 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis.

resultsWe evaluated 20 studies comprising a total of 400 subjects. Compared with control groups, the exosome-treated groups showed significantly improved histological outcomes, as measured by the OARSI score (n = 400; MD = -3.54; 95% CI = [-4.30, -2.79]; P < 0.00001; I

conclusionsExosome treatment improved OA compared to placebo treatment.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalExosomesOsteoarthritisAnimalsInjections, Intra-ArticularStem CellsTreatment OutcomeExosomesMeta-analysisOsteoarthritisStem cell

Identifiers

PMID39696589
PMCPMC11656911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.