Trial reportReproductive health2024
Lessons from an intervention study on the sustainability of after-school comprehensive sexuality education in Zambia: the perspectives of teachers, health workers and guardians.
Trial report in Reproductive health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundComprehensive sexuality education (CSE) has been introduced in many sub-Saharan African countries, but limited political interest and insufficient funding have resulted in many CSE initiatives being dependent on donor funding or non-governmental organisations (NGOs) supporting its implementation. This has created concerns about the sustainability of the programmes. The objective of this study was to explore factors affecting the sustainability of CSE delivered through a youth club organized after school hours in Zambia.
methodsWe interviewed teachers and community health workers (CHWs) who had implemented CSE as part of an after-school youth club set up as part of a cluster randomized controlled trial. The trial evaluated the effectiveness of economic support for adolescent girls, CSE and community dialogue meetings on adolescent childbearing. Teachers and CHWs in 63 schools were trained to facilitate the CSE youth clubs, and they were given economic incentives during the trial´s two-year intervention period to organize meetings every fortnight. Two years after the external support for the youth clubs ended, we conducted qualitative interviews with the facilitators in 15 of the 63 schools, interviews with some head teachers, and focus group discussions with guardians of adolescent girls.
resultsWhereas CHWs were generally supportive of teaching adolescents about contraception, some of the teachers stressed that abstinence was the most effective method to avoid pregnancy and diseases. The respondents' diverging points of view did not affect their willingness to continue teaching CSE, including contraception. However, the youth club meetings were only continued in a few schools after the external support period ended. This was attributed to transfers of trained teachers and a lack of training among the remaining staff; lapse of moral support, resources and incentives; limited involvement of the school management in the CSE initiative; and attention shifting to other projects.
conclusionTo ensure the sustainability of CSE initiatives for adolescents, emphasis should be placed on training several teachers in each school, and continued moral support and encouragement also appeared essential.
trial registrationISRCTN (ISRCTN12727868).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.