Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696554›Full record

ArticleCardio-oncology (London, England)2024

Challenges in the implementation of cardio-oncology trials: lessons learnt from investigating statins in the prevention of anthracycline cardiotoxicity.

John Lee, Sean Tan, Satish Ramkumar

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John LeeVictorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sean TanVictorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Satish RamkumarVictorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. satish.ramkumar@monashhealth.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advanced in targeted cancer therapies, anthracyclines remain essential in treating various malignancies, albeit with risks of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). Out of the myriad of mitigation strategies for CTRCD, statins are an attractive preventive therapy for anthracycline associated CTRCD given their widespread availability, cheap costs and added benefit of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk reduction. Recent trials of PREVENT, SPARE-HF, and STOP-CA investigated atorvastatin's efficacy in preventing CTRCD, with mixed outcomes. While STOP-CA showed a significant reduction in CTRCD rates (22% vs. 8% in placebo), PREVENT and SPARE-HF found no statistical differences between statin and placebo groups. The trials faced challenges such as selection bias, exclusion of patients with comorbidities, and reliance on imaging-derived outcomes, which may not reflect clinically meaningful benefits. This calls for improved trial designs that prioritize diverse patient recruitment, longer follow-ups, and clinically relevant endpoints to enhance the translational impact of findings. Addressing these challenges collaboratively between oncology and cardiology will be crucial for optimizing patient outcomes in this vulnerable population. Future studies should emphasize both immediate cardioprotective effects and long-term cardiovascular benefits of statins, especially in the context of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in cancer survivors.

Indexed as

AnthracyclineCardioprotectionCardiotoxicityStatin

Identifiers

PMID39696554
PMCPMC11653537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.