ArticleCardio-oncology (London, England)2024
Challenges in the implementation of cardio-oncology trials: lessons learnt from investigating statins in the prevention of anthracycline cardiotoxicity.
Article in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Cardioprotection to Trial Design: Rethinking Cardiac Safety in Oncology.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advanced in targeted cancer therapies, anthracyclines remain essential in treating various malignancies, albeit with risks of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). Out of the myriad of mitigation strategies for CTRCD, statins are an attractive preventive therapy for anthracycline associated CTRCD given their widespread availability, cheap costs and added benefit of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk reduction. Recent trials of PREVENT, SPARE-HF, and STOP-CA investigated atorvastatin's efficacy in preventing CTRCD, with mixed outcomes. While STOP-CA showed a significant reduction in CTRCD rates (22% vs. 8% in placebo), PREVENT and SPARE-HF found no statistical differences between statin and placebo groups. The trials faced challenges such as selection bias, exclusion of patients with comorbidities, and reliance on imaging-derived outcomes, which may not reflect clinically meaningful benefits. This calls for improved trial designs that prioritize diverse patient recruitment, longer follow-ups, and clinically relevant endpoints to enhance the translational impact of findings. Addressing these challenges collaboratively between oncology and cardiology will be crucial for optimizing patient outcomes in this vulnerable population. Future studies should emphasize both immediate cardioprotective effects and long-term cardiovascular benefits of statins, especially in the context of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in cancer survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.