Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696553›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2024

Detecting and classifying eco-anxiety: development of clinical cut-off scores for the climate change anxiety scale.

Suzanne M Cosh, Sarah E Williams, Amy D Lykins, Warren Bartik, Phillip J Tully

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Climate crisis and mental health: a scoping review eco-anxiety in latinamerican adults].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Eco-Anxiety and Mental Health: Correlates of Climate Change Distress.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. An Adolescent-Caregiver Dyad Approach to Climate Anxiety in the Pediatric Emergency Department.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suzanne M CoshSchool of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia. scosh@une.edu.au.
Sarah E WilliamsSchool of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia.
Amy D LykinsSchool of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia.
Warren BartikSchool of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia.
Phillip J TullySchool of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClimate change anxiety, that is worry and fear in relation to the awareness of the impacts of climate change, is widely observed around the world. Some evidence suggests that while climate change anxiety can, at times, be adaptive, a growing body of research has reported that climate change anxiety is also related to a range of negative mental health outcomes and psychological distress. Currently, however, there is limited ability to assess for elevated levels of climate change anxiety and to identify those who may need support. The present study, therefore, aimed to develop clinical cut-off scores on a measure of climate change anxiety.

methodsA largely representative sample of Australian young adults (aged 16-25 years) completed measures of psychological distress (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21) and the Climate Change Anxiety Scale. Markers of clinically meaningful psychological distress - elevated depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms-were used to classify cases. Receiver Operating Characteristics analyses were performed to assess the predictive ability of the indicators of psychological distress (mild, moderate, severe, and extremely severe thresholds of anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms) for detecting climate change anxiety and to ascertain optimal cut-off scores.

resultsThe Area Under the Curve was acceptable to moderate for detecting climate change anxiety across all analyses. Across symptom severity thresholds and markers of psychological distress, based on consideration of balancing sensitivity and specificity, results consistently suggested that a cut-score of 21 was indicative of mild-moderate climate change anxiety, with a cut-off score of 23 indicating severe-extremely severe climate change anxiety.

conclusionsThe proposed cut-offs can feasibly be used to identify those with elevated climate change anxiety. Use of these cut-off scores can inform research as well as be used to guide screening, assessment, and inform clinical practice. Results also highlight a high rate of climate change anxiety in young adults.

Indexed as

AnxietyClimate ChangeAdolescentAdultAustraliaDepressionFemaleHumansMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychological DistressStress, PsychologicalYoung AdultClimate change worryEcological concernEcological distressEco-worryPsychological disordersWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID39696553
PMCPMC11657576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.