ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Similarities in distribution pattern between acute multiple osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and vertebral fractures cascades.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Predictors of delayed union after surgical treatment in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
- Risk factors for new vertebral compression fracture following percutaneous vertebral augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on multivariate logistic regression analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Optimal management for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a network meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Bone cement distribution patterns in vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of vertebral kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty on pain and indicators of imaging parameters of the injured vertebrae in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic value and role in promoting fracture healing of deregulated circulating miR-204 in patients with osteoporotic fractures.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Quantitative analysis of bone cement dispersion height in percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty and comparison of therapeutic effects.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Effects of modified vertebral bone quality score and paravertebral muscle mass on multiple osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- A comparative analysis of three distinct approaches for the management of type A1 traumatic thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective cohort study with a minimum 6-year follow-up.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Posterior dynamic stabilization in addition to kyphoplasty for surgical management of unstable osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Biomechanical insights into anterolateral vertebral screw fixation in osteoporotic spines: a comparative study of fixation methods and positions using porcine vertebrae.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroudOsteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) cascades (OVCFcs) repeatedly cause vertebral compression to involve multiple vertebra. This study aimed to introduce an accelerated form of OVCFcs: acute multiple OVCF (amOVCF).
methodsOVCF patients with multiple vertebral augmentations in a spine center between June 2016 and October 2020 were retrospectively studied. Demographics, spine trauma, anatomical distribution, and distribution pattern of OVCF in OVCFcs and amOVCF were summarized and compared.
results429 patients with multiple vertebral augmentations in 1164 vertebra were included. There were 210 OVCFcs accumulating 622 OVCF and 219 amOVCF simultaneously involving 542 vertebra. The OVCFcs progressed at 0.48 fractures and 0.56 vertebra per year. Both OVCFcs and amOVCF demonstrated asymmetrical bimodal distribution in spine and most frequently involved L1. The incidence of adjacent OVCF was 40.14% in amOVCF with 2 OVCF and 84.72% in amOVCF with ≥ 3 OVCF, and the distribution pattern of OVCF was not significantly different between amOVCF and OVCFcs. The female/male ratio was 5.56 in OVCFcs and not different from that of 4.34 in amOVCF. The age of females (73.41 ± 8.08 and 76.29 ± 8.25 years old) but not males (77.20 ± 10.13 and 79.75 ± 10.21 years old) was significantly increased from initial to last OVCF in OVCFcs. amOVCF had similar age (72.26 ± 10.09 years old) as OVCFcs at initial OVCF (73.99 ± 8.51 years old) and were significantly younger than OVCFcs at last OVCF (76.82 ± 8.64 years old). 54.29% in OVCFcs and 48.4% in amOVCF reported no evident trauma, and the ratio of apparent spine trauma was higher in amOVCF (43.38%) than in OVCFcs (28.54%).
conclusionsamOVCF are accelerated form of OVCFcs showing similar anatomical distribution and distribution pattern of OVCF in spine. Both amOVCF and OVCFcs cause multiple fragility fractures without significant spine trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.