Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696521›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2024

PEARLS debriefing for social justice and equity: integrating health advocacy in simulation-based education.

Niki Soilis, Elizabeth Anne Kinsella, Walter Eppich, Adam Cheng, Lindsay Beavers, Farhan Bhanji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Niki SoilisInstitute of Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. niki.soilis@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6890-5137
Elizabeth Anne KinsellaInstitute of Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Walter EppichDepartment of Medical Education & Collaborative Practice Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Adam ChengKidSIM-ASPIRE Research Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Canada.
Lindsay BeaversSimulation Program, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Farhan BhanjiInstitute of Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Addressing health inequities in health professions education is essential for preparing healthcare workers to meet the demands of diverse communities. While simulation has become a widely recognized and effective method for providing safe and authentic clinical learning experiences, there has been limited attention towards the power of simulation in preparing health practitioners to work with groups who experience health disparities due to systems of inequality. Balancing technical proficiency with educational approaches that foster critical reflection and inform action oriented towards social accountability is essential. Transformational learning promotes the development of critical consciousness through critical reflection. Debriefing plays a crucial role in fostering learning in this direction by providing a structured opportunity to critically reflect on taken for granted assumptions, examine power and privilege embedded within systems and structures, and empower learners to take action toward changing those conditions. Building on the Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS) Healthcare Debriefing Tool, we propose a PEARLS Debriefing for Social Justice and Equity (DSJE) Tool that specifically directs attention to systems of inequality that contribute to health disparities for vulnerable groups across a range of simulation scenarios. This approach has two aims: (a) to transform debriefings into a critically reflective space by engaging learners in dialogue about social and structural determinants of health that may create or perpetuate inequities and (b) to foster critical reflection on what actions can be taken to improve the health and well-being of identified at risk and vulnerable groups. From this perspective, we can use the adapted PEARLS Tool to incorporate conversations about systems of inequality, equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) into our existing educational practices, and make concentrated efforts towards community-driven and socially conscious simulation-based education (SBE).

Indexed as

Critical reflectionDebriefingDiversityEquityHealthcare simulationInclusion

Identifiers

PMID39696521
PMCPMC11658125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.