Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696492›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal for equity in health2024

Access to health insurance amongst people with disabilities and its association with healthcare use, health status and financial protection in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Luthfi Azizatunnisa', Hannah Kuper, Lena Morgon Banks

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal for equity in health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Estimating the magnitude and scope of disability-related direct costs: a systematised review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luthfi Azizatunnisa'International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. luthfi.azizatunnisa@lshtm.ac.uk.
Hannah KuperInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lena Morgon BanksInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office PO8073Indonesia Endowment Funds for Education/Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (LPDP) LOG-1619/LPDP.3/2024the Arts & Humanities Research Council AH/X009580/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with disabilities often incur higher costs for healthcare, due to higher needs, greater indirect costs, and the need for services not offered by the public system. Yet, people with disabilities are more likely to experience poverty and so have reduced capacity to pay. Health insurance is an important social protection strategy to meet healthcare needs and avoid catastrophic expenditures for this group. This systematic review synthesized evidence on health insurance coverage and potential effects among people with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

methodsThis systematic review followed PRISMA Guidelines. We searched English peer-reviewed articles from nine databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, PsyInfo, Global Health, and Econlit) from January 2000 to 24 January 2023. Two independent reviewers conducted the article selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using NIH Guidelines. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they quantitatively assessed at least one of four key outcomes amongst people with disabilities: health insurance coverage/access, the association between health insurance and health care utilization, financial protection, or health status/outcome. Narrative synthesis was deployed due to high variety of outcome measurements.

resultsOut of 8,545 records retrieved and three from hand search, 38 studies covering data from 51 countries met the eligibility criteria. Over two-thirds (68.4%) focused on access/coverage, which was generally limited amongst people with disabilities. Seventeen studies (44.7%) examined healthcare utilization, with a positive association (9/12) found between health insurance and the use of disability-related services. However, its association with general healthcare utilization (5 studies) remained inconclusive. Financial protection, explored by six studies (15.8%), similarly yielded inconclusive results. Only four studies (10.5%) reported on health status, and the findings suggest a favourable association of health insurance with self-reported health among people with disabilities (2/4), despite the limited number of high-quality studies.

conclusionsThere is considerable variability and limited evidence regarding health insurance coverage and its potential impact among individuals with disabilities in LMICs. This gap highlights the pressing need for further evaluations of health insurance, with a specific focus on people with disabilities, aligning with the broader goal of achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC).

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42023389533.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth Services AccessibilityInsurance, HealthPersons with DisabilitiesHealth StatusHumansInsurance CoveragePatient Acceptance of Health CareDisabled personHealth equityInclusive health systemUniversal Health Coverage

Identifiers

PMID39696492
PMCPMC11658242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.