ArticleBMC veterinary research2024
Microbiome-proteome analysis of gastrointestinal microbiota and longissimus thoracis muscle proteins in cattle with high and low grades of marbling.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Food and Medicine Homology Substances as Potential Modulators of the Gut-Muscle Axis in Animal Meat Quality: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Unveiling the Role of Rumen Microbiome in Modulating Intramuscular Fat Deposition of Pingliang Red Cattle.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Melatonin Enhances Muscle Development and Suppresses Fat Deposition in Cashmere Goats by Implicating Gut Microbiota and Ameliorating Systemic Antioxidant Status.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Marbling is a key indicator of the meat quality of ruminants. Gastrointestinal microbiota may regulate the formation of marbling by influencing the nutritional metabolism of animals. This study analyzed the composition and functional differences of microbiota in the rumen and cecum, the differences in volatile fatty acids (VFAs) content in the longissimus thoracis muscle, and the differences in protein abundance in the longissimus thoracis muscle of ruminants with different marbling grades through microbiome-proteome analysis. The results showed that the diversity of gastrointestinal microbiota in high-marbling ruminants was significantly higher than that in low-marbling ruminants. The relative abundance of Firmicutes and Akkermansia in the gastrointestinal of high-marbling ruminants was higher than that in low-marbling ruminants, while the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes and Prevotella was lower. In addition, PICRUST2 functional prediction results of the microbiota revealed that the gastrointestinal microbiota of high-marbling ruminants was mainly involved in the biosynthesis pathways of fat and lipids. The metabolomics results showed that the content of VFAs (acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, isovaleric acid, valeric acid, and hexanoic acid) in the rumen of high-marbling ruminants was significantly higher than that in low-marbling ruminants. The proteome analysis results indicated that the differential proteins in the longissimus thoracis muscle of high-marbling ruminants were mainly involved in lipid transport and metabolism compared to low-marbling ruminants. In summary, the differences in the composition and function of the gastrointestinal microbiota led to higher levels of VFAs in the gastrointestinal tract of high-marbling ruminants, which provides the basis for lipid/fat synthesis. The proteome results of the longissimus thoracis muscle support the view that high-marbling ruminants have richer lipid transport and metabolic functions in their muscle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.