Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696434›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2024

Detection and classification of long terminal repeat sequences in plant LTR-retrotransposons and their analysis using explainable machine learning.

Jakub Horvath, Pavel Jedlicka, Marie Kratka, Zdenek Kubat, Eduard Kejnovsky, Matej Lexa

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Acytota and the evolution of complexity.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jakub HorvathFaculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Botanicka 68a, Brno, 60200, Czech Republic. jakubhorvath119@gmail.com.
Pavel JedlickaDepartment of Plant Developmental Genetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Kralovopolska 135, Brno, 61200, Czech Republic.
Marie KratkaDepartment of Plant Developmental Genetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Kralovopolska 135, Brno, 61200, Czech Republic.
Zdenek KubatDepartment of Plant Developmental Genetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Kralovopolska 135, Brno, 61200, Czech Republic.
Eduard KejnovskyDepartment of Plant Developmental Genetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Kralovopolska 135, Brno, 61200, Czech Republic.
Matej LexaFaculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Botanicka 68a, Brno, 60200, Czech Republic. lexa@fi.muni.cz.

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 21-00580S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong terminal repeats (LTRs) represent important parts of LTR retrotransposons and retroviruses found in high copy numbers in a majority of eukaryotic genomes. LTRs contain regulatory sequences essential for the life cycle of the retrotransposon. Previous experimental and sequence studies have provided only limited information about LTR structure and composition, mostly from model systems. To enhance our understanding of these key sequence modules, we focused on the contrasts between LTRs of various retrotransposon families and other genomic regions. Furthermore, this approach can be utilized for the classification and prediction of LTRs.

resultsWe used machine learning methods suitable for DNA sequence classification and applied them to a large dataset of plant LTR retrotransposon sequences. We trained three machine learning models using (i) traditional model ensembles (Gradient Boosting), (ii) hybrid convolutional/long and short memory network models, and (iii) a DNA pre-trained transformer-based model using k-mer sequence representation. All three approaches were successful in classifying and isolating LTRs in this data, as well as providing valuable insights into LTR sequence composition. The best classification (expressed as F1 score) achieved for LTR detection was 0.85 using the hybrid network model. The most accurate classification task was superfamily classification (F1=0.89) while the least accurate was family classification (F1=0.74). The trained models were subjected to explainability analysis. Positional analysis identified a mixture of interesting features, many of which had a preferred absolute position within the LTR and/or were biologically relevant, such as a centrally positioned TATA-box regulatory sequence, and TG..CA nucleotide patterns around both LTR edges.

conclusionsOur results show that the models used here recognized biologically relevant motifs, such as core promoter elements in the LTR detection task, and a development and stress-related subclass of transcription factor binding sites in the family classification task. Explainability analysis also highlighted the importance of 5'- and 3'- edges in LTR identity and revealed need to analyze more than just dinucleotides at these ends. Our work shows the applicability of machine learning models to regulatory sequence analysis and classification, and demonstrates the important role of the identified motifs in LTR detection.

Indexed as

CNN-LSTMDeep learningDNABERTEukaryoteRegulatory mechanismsRepeatSequence analysisSHAP scoreTFBSTranscription factor binding sitesTransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID39696434
PMCPMC11656987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.