ArticleBMC nursing2024
Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Attitudes Related to Trauma-Informed Care (ARTIC-C) scale in nursing inters: a psychometric analysis.
Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNursing interns, the future nurses, often find it challenging to interact with trauma survivors due to their lack of experience and training. Assessing their attitudes and knowledge in trauma-informed care can improve their clinical performance.
objectiveTo culturally adapt and assess the reliability and validity of the Attitudes Related to Trauma-Informed Care Scale in Chinese nursing interns.
designQuantitative cross-sectional design.
methodsThe translation of Attitudes Related to the Trauma-Informed Care (ARTIC) Scale followed guidelines for the cross-cultural adaptation process. A survey was conducted with 490 nursing interns from two colleges in China in February and May 2024, and seven experts evaluated the content equivalence of each item. Reliability and validity were assessed using item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency reliability, and test-retest reliability.
resultsThe Chinese version of the ARTIC-C retained 35 items and demonstrated high content validity. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 6-factor structure, explaining 61.887% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the 6-factor model adequately represented the scale structure: chi-square/degree of freedom (CMIN/DF) = 1.544, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.045, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.969, incremental fit index (IFI) = 0.969, Tucker Lewis index (TLI) = 0.966, and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.046. The scale had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.916 and test-retest reliability of 0.876.
conclusionsThe Chinese version of the ARTIC-C scale has demonstrated strong reliability and validity, making it an effective tool for measuring Chinese nursing interns' attitudes and knowledge regarding trauma-informed care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.