Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696349›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2024

Evaluating the home-based intervention strategy (HIS-UK) to reduce new chlamydia infection among young men aged 16-25 years by promoting correct and consistent condom use: findings from a randomised controlled trial.

Nicole Stone, Cynthia Graham, Stephen Bremner, Nuala McGrath, Rowena Bedford, Katherine E Brown, Katie Newby, Amanda Clarke, Louise Jackson, Leanne Morrison and 2 more

Abstract readEquivalence TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nicole StoneCentre for Sexual Health Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Cynthia GrahamCentre for Sexual Health Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. cygraham@iu.edu.
Stephen BremnerDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Nuala McGrathCHERISH programme, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Rowena BedfordNDORMS, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Katherine E BrownPublic Health and Applied Behaviour Change Laboratory, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Katie NewbyPublic Health and Applied Behaviour Change Laboratory, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Amanda ClarkeUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
Louise JacksonInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Leanne MorrisonDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Tom NadarzynskiSchool of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK.
Ye ToBrighton and Sussex Clinical Trials Unit, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorrect and consistent condom use is the most effective method to reduce transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs).

objectiveTo compare the HIS-UK intervention to usual condom information and distribution care for effect on chlamydia test positivity.

methodsTrial design A 3-parallel arm randomised controlled trial (1:1:1 allocation, two intervention arms vs. control). Randomisation using permuted blocks of varying lengths, with stratification by site, ethnicity and sexual-partnering risk. Repeated measures design with monthly follow-up to six months post-randomisation. Setting Sexual health services in seven NHS Trusts and one university medical centre. Telephone and video consultations, online and in participants' homes in England, UK. Participants Target sample of 2231 men and people with penises, aged 16-25, at risk of STIs. Intervention HIS-UK delivered (1) face-to-face by health professionals (proHIS) or (2) digitally (eHIS). Two-weeks self-practice and experimentation using the HIS-UK condom kit. Primary health outcome Chlamydia test positivity by six-months. Secondary outcomes Frequency of unprotected sexual intercourse, reported condom use errors and problems, attitudes and use experience. Analyses Chlamydia test positivity by six months analysed by logistic regression. Secondary outcomes analysed using linear mixed effects models with fixed effects and a random effect for the repeated measures, and generalised estimating equations with a logit link, adjusting for fixed effects and specifying an autoregressive-1 correlation structure.

resultsSeven hundred twenty-five participants (proHIS:241, eHIS:243, control:241) randomised. 575 participants completed all baseline activities, 189 (32.9%) reached six-months post-randomisation. The absolute difference in chlamydia test positivity between arms was -4.9 percentage points at six months (7.9% HIS-UK, 12.8% control). The odds of chlamydia test positivity during follow-up were 55% lower for HIS-UK participants (p=.261). HIS-UK showed a positive impact on recent condom use over time (p<.001). Significant reductions in condom errors and problems among HIS-UK participants were observed (p=.035). Lubricant use increased among HIS-UK participants, with evidence of an intervention-by-time interaction (p=.051), and a decline in poor condom fit and feel reports, but without intervention effect.

conclusionsThis study provides valuable insights into the potential of HIS-UK to enhance sexual health practices among at-risk populations at-risk of STI transmission.

trial registrationISRCTN registration: 11400820 (23/10/2019).

Indexed as

Chlamydia InfectionsCondomsAdolescentAdultEnglandHealth PromotionHumansMaleYoung AdultBehaviour changeChlamydiaCondomInterventionLubricantSexually transmitted infectionSTIYoung men

Identifiers

PMID39696349
PMCPMC11654348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.